|
Comparing Drawdowns |
Marcy Petrini
September, 2026
I teach weekly in person for the Mississippi Craftsmen Guild at the Mississippi Bill Waller Craft Center. Students plan their projects with my help, using structures from a variety of books. Recently I realized that the drafts students use can vary with the publication. Furthermore, many publications don’t use a drawdown, just the draft and perhaps a sample of the cloth which is not always lined up with the draft. I decided to clarify the topic, adding the drawdown as well.
![]() |
| If we were planning a straight twill project, our drawdown may look as shown above. |
![]() |
|
In older books, we may see that the tie-up is filled in with X’s. |
![]() |
|
If O’s are used for the tie-up, |
Let’s look at the difference between the two drawdowns below: the one on the left is identical to the first draft we saw, and the drawdown is the same as the one labelled for a rising shed loom, with the first row starting with the blue warp where it’s circled. On the right we have the same drawdown as the one labelled for sinking shed, with the circled first row in yellow-green.
![]() |
![]() |
How do we tell which type of drawdown do we have if the tie-up is shown in numbers?
![]() |
![]() |
Let’s look at the first pick. The threading, tie-up and treadling look the same. However, on the left, the warp color blue shows in the drawdown in the first row; thus, the warp must have risen to form the shed and cover the weft. On the right, the yellow-green weft color shows, thus the warp must have been lowered to be covered by the weft. I like to call the point where threading, tie-up, treadling and drawdown meet, the “magic corner.” It will always tell us what kind of loom the drawdown expects.
Let’s think about the fabric, which has two sides: where the warp shows on the surface we are observing, the weft shows on the other side. I have chosen a straight twill example because it is easy to depict and understand, and it is not symmetrical. In a more complex motif, the fabric may not look like the drawdown. Look underneath!
If we are weaving on a rising shed loom and the pattern we want to use is shown on a sinking shed draft, we may want to see the “right” side of the cloth when weaving to avoid possible errors. We can change the tie-up by “tying what’s untied and untying what’s tied.” We can then rearrange the tie-up the way we feel comfortable thinking about it.
![]() |
![]() |
|
This also explains why some publications provide the tie-up as shown above. |
Tie-ups are for weaving convenience. Some old looms have a direct tie-up: each treadle is tied to one shaft. Sometimes our six-treadle looms have to be at least partially tied one-to-one because the treadling is complex and we don’t have enough treadles. Table looms and dobby looms are also direct tie-up.
Thus, when we talk about the treadling of a structure, in our case the straight twill, we don’t use the treadle numbers, we use the treadling steps:
| 1 & 2 |
| 2 & 3 |
| 3 & 4 |
| 4 & 1 |
The reason is that the tie-up can change. The ones we have been discussing are the “standard” tie-up for 2/2 twills; these are twills where every shed has two shafts up and two down. For step 1 & 2 of the straight twill, shafts 1 & 2 are up and shafts 3 & 4 are down, or vice versa, depending on the loom. That’s true for every shed.
However, the complete standard tie-up for four shafts includes the two treadles that can be used for plain weave, 1 & 3 and 2 & 4. Which treadles are used for the plain weave tie-up depends on the weaver’s preference. Below are some possibilities:
![]() |
Therefore, the 1 & 2 treadling step for the straight twill could be on treadle 2, or 3, or 1, among others.
The complete standard tie-up is needed for some structures, for example overshot. The plain weave forms a balanced grid which is called a tabby. That’s why sometimes 1 & 3 and 2 & 4 are called the tabbies. Technically, however, they are tabbies only if they form a perfectly balanced plain weave with the warp.
The last topic is the direction of the drawdown vs. that of the weaving.
Below on the left is the rising shed drawdown we have already seen, as we traditionally show it, the way we write, top to bottom. Our first pick is shown with an arrow.
![]() |
![]() |
On the right is the way we weave, the first pick closer to the front beam, shown with the arrow. The twill slants in different directions.
To avoid potential errors, we can do one of two things, depending on our resources. Some draft applications give the possibility of doing the drawdown from bottom to top. If not, or if doing the drawdown manually (which I did for the first 15 years of my weaving life), we can start at the top with the last pick of the repeat.
If your fabric doesn’t look like your drawdown, think about these possibilities!
Happy planning!
Marcy
|
Intuition |
Marcy Petrini
August, 2026
When I tell weavers that I like to think about color in terms of how our brain and visual system see it, sometimes I get the response: Oh, I have an intuitive feeling for color.
OK, but none of us are born knowing that red and green will look muddy if blended together. How does anybody “get” that intuition?
The Briggs-Myers Type Indicator (MBTI) is a psychological tool that evaluates how an individual takes in information; “intuitive” is one of the four pairs of attributes of each individual.

Intuitives tend to quickly see the big picture, and then fill in the details, if needed. It sounds great, but we need to remember that there is no guarantee of the veracity of the information whether taken in quickly or not.
Just because we have the intuitive attribute on the Brigg-Myers Type Indicator doesn’t mean that we have an intuition in all the areas of our lives.
Intuition is one of my MBTI attributes. I have NO intuition for gardening. I love flowers, plants, and walking in our garden. Growing plants? I have killed several. Luckily I am married to a gardener.
Here is “Sunlight Stepping through the Garden”: weaving my Marcy, garden by Terry!

Being an intuitive, I have thought long and hard about how I learn the things I know because I firmly believe that intuition is internalized knowledge. I think there are two ways that I internalize knowledge, and I think this may be true whether an individual is an intuitive or not.
A common way to internalize knowledge is coming to it without really remembering how it occurred. I remember being asked by a weaver how I sett 8/2 TencelTM. My answer was that I don’t use 8/2 TencelTM, so I don’t know, I use 10/2 TencelTM. How come, she asked, it’s harder to find. I can mix and match 10/2 TencelTM with 20/2 silk, was my answer.
I have been mixing them for years. When did I start doing it? How did I figure that out? I honestly don’t know. This is what I call “I don’t know how I know what I know.” (Ironically in the Fall 2026 issue of Handwoven Susan DuBois of Treenway Silks states the same similarly between 20/2 silk and 10/2 cotton, which is the same size as 10/2 TencelTM).
Here is a scarf: 20/2 silk warp from Treenway Silks, 10/2 TencelTM weft from Teresa Ruch.

Another way I have acquired my intuition is from the past; while I may not know the exact time and space, I know the circumstances.
When I boil water to cook pasta, I toss salt in. A visiting friend saw me do it and asked how much salt I tossed in. Not only I didn’t know, but I couldn’t reproduce the amount because it is so automatic. I suspect I learned it by watching my Grandma and my Mom do it a million times. No measuring anything, no recipe. I wasn’t specifically paying attention; I just internalized the process.
Similarly knowledge can become intuitive through planned learning and carefully paying attention. A lot of what I know about weaving has come that way. Each project has a planning sheet, providing knowledge over the years. If I am using a yarn I have used before – and 20/2 silk is a favorite – I know whether to sett it at 30 or 36 epi depending on the twill floats. The 20/2 silk of the 40-shaft undulating twill below was sett at 36 to have a drapey but not sleazy shawl.

I know the shrinkage of the yarns I use because I have planned and measured after wet finishing. And I know about color by studying the spectra the brain sees and how it works by subtraction.
These details may not be what we traditionally consider intuitive, but they may seem so to the inexperienced students. “How do you know that?” Ask students. “From paying attention to my doing” is my answer.
Happy Learning!
Marcy
|
Teaching Beginners |
Marcy Petrini
July, 2026
I love to teach beginning weaving. When those wefts cross the warp for the first time, the magic begins with a satisfied look that says it all.
Students receive a beginning weaving monograph (see below); after each session they review the section they used (yes, it’s homework and they do it!). Of course, during class I am there to help and so are the more experienced students.

After that first beginning class, many students opt to continue: a new convert! A new member of our tribe!
The second project is usually a twill. We use the planning sheet in their monograph, and we go over the various steps.
As they work I see them often referring to the monograph, pondering what comes next. As the whole process is repeated, students become confident, but sometimes they still need to search in the monograph for the next step. And occasionally – oops – someone forgets a step. Not fun.
To avoid forgetting steps, I devised this checklist that includes the steps from planning the project to wet finishing (download the checklist PDF here). It’s not to replace the monograph, but as a quick reminder, so no steps are missed.

I color coded the checklist by groups so finding the next step is easier: planning (yellow), warping (blue), weaving (green), and finishing (pink)
We dress the loom from the back to the front, so the checklist takes the students through those steps. There are various ways to perform all the steps for weaving, use what works for you.
Happy weaving – and happy teaching!
Marcy
|
TAW Revisited |
Marcy Petrini
June, 2026
In the last month’s blog, we discussed tromp-as-writ – treadle as written: given a twill, we can derive the treadling when using the standard tie-up for twills, that is, two treadles at a time, forming the diagonal that defines twills.
Below again is the pointed twill example: threaded 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, repeat, the treadling sequence is also 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, repeat. (Drawdown is rising shed.)

Tromp as writ can also be applied to block weaves, but it works best if we use a profile draft.
Below is a simple example of a profile draft. It tells us to thread block A, then B, C, D, C and B again (repeat). The tromp as writ treadling is to weave block A, block B, etc.
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
C |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
While profile drafts are extremely helpful when designing fabrics with block weaves, we must remember how many shafts we have available, because for each block, we must substitute the threading of that block.
Using the simple profile draft above, for summer and winter block A is threaded 1, 3, 2, 3; block B 1, 4, 2, 4, etc. Thus, we need six shafts to weave the 4-block profile draft.
For the tromp as writ treadling, we weave the treadling steps of block A, than block B, etc. The drawdown is below. It is sinking shed, even though I weave on rising shed looms; I find it easier to think of block weaves as having the weft cover the block: thus, for block A, shafts 1 and 3 followed by 2 and 3 are lowered, allowing the weft to cover the warp on those shafts. The tie shafts, 1 and 2, alternate in limiting the float; the resulting blocks are not solid and in the fabric background the warp peeks through.

The drawdown shown is a bit deceiving if we are not familiar with the structure. Every pattern pick of summer and winter is surrounded by tabby picks that form the background. Thus, we need two additional treadles to weave it.
Here is partial drawdown for block A that shows how our weaving actually proceeds:

Below is the fabric sample using the profile draft but woven with a different treadling; it does show the blocks and the background formed by the warp and ground tabby.

Profile drafts work best with tied unit weave of which summer and winter is one. The blocks are fixed; if we need a wider area, we simply increase the number of blocks, but the length of the floats stays the same.
Most tied unit weaves have a treadling generally associated with them, although many more options are possible. The drawdown above shows the treadling for summer and winter called single (each single pattern shaft is treadled with each tabby), while the fabric sample was woven using the treadling called “treadling o’s” because of the appearance of the blocks. Thus, the profile draft doesn’t specify which treadling to use, just the order of weaving of the blocks; the weaver chooses the treadling. (For more on summer and winter and its treadlings, see the entry in Block-Aid).
For other block structures, the weaver must make a decision as to the width of the block. For example, let’s use the same profile draft for overshot.
I learned block A of overshot as 1, 2, 1, 2. Others consider 1, 2 the kernel of the block. Either way, the block could also be 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2 and so on as long as shafts 1 and 2 alternate. The weft floats over the width of the block, so the size of the yarn should also determine the number of threads in that block. In a block too wide, the yarn will sag.
Block B of overshot is 2, 3, 2, 3. Shafts are shared between blocks, resulting in four blocks on four shafts. Thus, the profile draft we have been using could be applied to overshot on four shafts.
The blocks don’t have to be the same number of threads, just as long as each follows the definition: 2, 3 for B, 3, 4 for C, 4, 1 for D.
Below is the sinking shed drawdown we obtain when we use block threadings for the profile draft. As in summer & winter, each pattern pick is surrounded by a tabby pick. The tabbies are shown at the bottom of the drawdown. Overshot is derived from twills, so the tabbies are the classical 1 & 3 vs. 2 & 4. In contrast the tabbies for summer and winter are ties – 1 & 2 – vs. all pattern shafts.

Below is the fabric sample. Overshot has three classical areas: the overshot blocks made by the pattern weft, the plain weave blocks where the pattern weft floats on the other side of the fabric and the half-tones where the pattern weft peeks through the ground.

Below is another profile draft which illustrates both its usefulness and how well its use fits tied unit weaves.
|
|
|
|
C |
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
B |
B |
|
|
B |
B |
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
A |
We can substitute the blocks in the profile draft with a threading for a tied-unit weave shown in the drawdown below. This structure doesn’t have a common name, but can be classified as having two pattern shafts per block (3 & 4 for the first block), two ties that are unpaired because they are not next to each other (1 & 2 for all blocks) with a ratio of 1:2 (2 tie threads & 4 pattern threads or 2:4 is 1:2). This nomenclature of “double, two-unpaired ties, 1:2 ratio” is not unique, so we have to add what makes it unique: the pattern shafts are arranged in reverse pointed order with the ties.
The name is not important. What matters here is how wide the threading would be if we expanded the entire profile draft. Given the name and the threading of the first block, we can derive the rest of the threading.

There are two blocks A, three blocks B and two blocks C, three blocks B, then the repeat starts. Below is a fabric sample.

While the first profile draft in this blog was easily woven with overshot – or any other structure with variable width blocks – the profile draft we just used doesn’t easily convert: what does it mean to have two blocks of A in overshot, when one block can be as wide as we like? However, we could take this profile draft and adjust it for relative size: block A and C could be the same size, block B a third wider.
In designing, profile drafts are very useful. We can manipulate our tools to fit our needs.
Happy weaving!
Marcy
|
What Treadling Should I Use? |
Marcy Petrini
May, 2026
Once threaded, there may be many options for treadling. Every structure has its own, but using others is a good way to weave unique projects on a single long warp.
Beginners can be overwhelmed by the choices, however. What will work best?
I like to think of the treadling possibilities as broadly falling into four groups: 1. Treadling specific to the structure; 2. Alternate treadling for a structure; 3. Using the treadling of one structure on the threading of another; 4. Treadling methods, that is, treadling directions that are not associated with any structure, but can be applied to various ones.
This way of thinking works well for four-shaft structures, but with more it can become ambiguous. However, once we understand the options, choosing alternate treadlings can be applied to any shafts.
A Structure’s Own Treadling
A fabric determines the structure, and to be able to weave a specific one, we need the threading and treadling steps that define that structure. When we look at the various weaves, it seems likely that many of them were derived in a circular way: threading, then treadling steps, back to threading, etc. Thus, it is often difficult to look at a threading and figure out what its own treadling is.
The twills called “regular” are the exception; they use the standard tie-up on four shaft, which uses all four shafts taken two at a time. Of the resulting six possibilities, four are used for twills. Incidentally, it is not by coincidence that 4-shaft looms often have six treadles.
Emery’s definition of a twill is: progressive successions of floats in diagonal alignments. If we look at a twill fabric, the diagonal is often obvious as in the fabric below.
We can see that diagonal alignment below in the drawdown of the four-shafts straight twill, which was used to weave the sample above.
The threading, treadling and the four treadles are all arranged in a diagonal. Of the six possible treadles in the standard tie-up, twills use the four that allow the diagonal to form: drop one shaft and add the next: start with 1 & 2, then drop 1 and add 3, that is, 2 & 3, etc. (The other two treadles of the standard tie-up – 1 & 3 and 2 & 4 – are used for plain weave.)
The treadling shown here for the straight twill is called “tromp-as-writ”, that is, treadle as written. We can see the steps in the drawdown above: the threading is 1, 2, 3, 4, the treadling is 1, 2, 3, 4; again, this works with the standard tie-up. There are other twills that do not use it.
Knowing the tromp-as-writ rule, means that we can find the twill’s own treadling. For example, let’s use the pointed twill: the threading is 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, repeat; the treadling is 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, repeat, when using the standard tie-up.
Here is the drawdown:
While all structures have a treadling of their own, it is not always possible to obtain it by simply looking at the threading.
Let’s take huck, for example, a rectangular float weave (by Emery’s classification, one warp, one weft, with blocks of floats). If we are familiar with this structure, or if we look it up, this is what we find on four shafts: two blocks treadled to obtain weft floats; the drawdown below is a rising-shed drawdown, showing two repeats.
Without getting too caught up in the details, we see that huck is derived from plain weave. We can see how plain weave fills the fabric where there are no floats; the floats are obtained by removing one of the plain weave shafts in the treadling. However, we have to start with a specific threading.
Regardless, we recognize that drawdown as the directions for weaving huck.
Alternate Treadling For a Structure
Huck forms the weft floats we have seen in the previous rising-shed drawdown while warp floats are formed on the other side of the fabric.
We can add to the tie-up to give us the treadling steps to weave warp floats, in addition to weft floats, on the same side of the fabric, as shown by the rising shed drawdown below.
We can also combine the warp and weft floats to form huck lace, as shown in the next drawdown.
While it is great to have all these options for treadling, cautions must be used in some cases when applying an alternate treadling to a threading. Huck is one of those case. Both huck with weft and warp floats can be easily exchanged – they are, after all, different sides of the same fabric. Huck lace, however, has more drape, so adjustments must be made up front with the block design and the sett to avoid a sleazy fabric, rather than a lacey one.
Other common structures have treadling options; for example, overshot tromp-as-writ treadling is called “start fashion” but “rose fashion” is an alternative. Summer and winter is woven in “singles” but treadlings for “paired x’s” and “paired o’s” are popular options (These are described in the Pictionary©, look them up if you want to know more).
Using a Treadling of One Structure on the Threading of Another Structure
Twill gamps are the perfect example. Several threadings are used across the fabric and then each is woven with its own treadling. Besides the tromp-as-writ fabric for each twill, we obtain all the other possibilities.
Below is the drawdown of my twill gamp as an example.
Starting at the right-hand corner, I used a straight threading (sometimes called straight draw, shown in red) followed by a pointed threading (in green). I started the treadling with a straight draw (in yellow); the upper right portion of the drawdown above is the straight twill, tromp-as-writ. Next to it on the left, there is a straight treadling on a pointed threading.
The second treadling is called return or pointed (in blue); on the bottom left corner we have the tromp-as-writ for the pointed threading, the pointed twill. The blue weft on the red warp forms a straight threading with a return treadling.
Thus, for two threadings and two treadlings, we have four possible fabrics!
|
Pointed threading |
Straight twill |
|
Pointed twill |
Straight draw |
Note that, in the nomenclature above, there are two twills, that is, two threadings with their respective tromp-as-writ treadlings. The other two are combination of threadings and treadlings. That is, we cannot call the yellow and green square a pointed twill with a straight treadling! The fabric determines the structure and that square is not a pointed twill! Clear vocabulary makes for clear thinking. And, yes, I have been known to slip-up and call a pointed threading a “twill”. If it doesn’t look like the blue weft on the green warp in the drawdown above, it’s not a pointed twill!
While the mixing and matching of twills is widespread, there are other threadings that borrow the treadling of others. Summer and winter, for example, can be treadled as overshot.
Treadling Methods
As I said in the introduction, treadling methods are directions without threading of their own. Generally, they can be applied to more than one threading, but not to all categories of threadings. They are not structures, despite the fact that sometimes they are called “weave”.
In fact, waffle weave is one favorite treadling method, applied to some type of pointed threading. Below is the drawdown, which shows some 5-thread long floats on this particular pointed threading.
The plain weave sections that appear throughout the fabric cause the floats to be pulled in resulting in the “waffles” that give the treadling method its name.
The Pictionary© has more treadling methods. Try them for yet other treadling options.
Study all your possibilities to determine the best use for the final fabric.
Happy weaving!
Marcy











